Validate your slot math. Improve the player experience.

reSlotFrom holding the lineto running the portfolio.

Meeting your RTP target is just the beginning. Kairos, our proprietary player model trained in-house at reSlot, predicts how long different players will play, how likely they are to return the next day, and how much they will wager. Loop keeps testing and refining configurations, helping you balance retention, costs and returns.

Kairos × LoopMetric trajectory · Illustration

Same math, different player responses.

One plan, three metrics evaluated together

KairosPlayer modelParallel Agent Orchestration
Feedback returned

Understand each player type’s outcomes before deciding what to optimize.

Reference experiment · Disciplined players
What do these metrics mean?

The animation illustrates possible trade-offs using the starting values and outcomes of synthetic experiments. Intermediate rounds are generated for the demo.

28 days · 10 seeds per setting

Synthetic players, Bonus off. Shows research results, not live data or Kairos predictions.

Total payouts ÷ total wagered. This is the actual result from simulated behavior, not the theoretical RTP on the paytable.

The expected share of players who return on the second day under a given player cohort and game configuration. This shows estimates from a synthetic experiment, not measured live retention.

Net compensation minus suppression recovery, as a share of total wagered. Negative values mean control recovery exceeded compensation spend.

More likely to follow stop-loss and take-profit limits. The same game configuration produced different return behavior and cost structures.

The original control configuration used as the study control, kept unchanged.

An illustrative trajectory based on published synthetic experiments. Intermediate rounds are generated for the animation, not measured results or live AI predictions. They do not guarantee performance.

Kairos / Player outcomes

From holding the line to running the portfolio.

Compare math metrics and player outcomes side by sideKairos
GameRTPHit frequencyVolatilityPredicted session lengthExpected D2 retentionTurnover per player
Demo A96.2%27.9%7.1142 spins31%218×
Demo B94.7%24.7%8.6118 spins27%186×
Demo C92.1%20.1%10.396 spins22%151×

Illustrative figures showing how metrics are compared; these are not predictions for your game.

Built on Loop Engineering for Self-Improving Slot Agents ↗

Find your starting point

Which problem are you solving?

Preparing a game for certification, managing live operations or building with AI? Start with the decision in front of you.

Certified studios

Which math should you take to certification?

Compare player outcomes alongside the numbers in your PAR sheet.

  • Compare session length, next-day retention, and turnover per player across math variants.
  • Keep your PAR sheet workflow and see the tradeoffs between math metrics and player experience before submission.
View solution

Dynamic control

Can the same budget deliver better retention?

Evaluate compensation cost alongside retention to find configurations worth adjusting.

  • Compare how player segments respond to compensation, suppression, and newcomer templates.
  • Receive recalibrated configurations and evaluation reports, with continuous tuning as the player mix changes.
View solution

LLM studios

AI created the design. Does it meet your targets?

Generate, simulate, validate and refine in one loop.

  • Validate RTP, hit frequency, and volatility for generated designs, and identify deviations from target.
  • Test the experience with synthetic players, then feed the findings into the next Loop iteration.
View solution

From one sheet to the full portfolio

Validate the math. Understand the players. Keep improving.

  1. 01Start here

    Get the math right first

    Import a PAR sheet, weight table, or control configuration to check RTP, hit frequency, and cost. Run a browser simulator first, then decide what needs deeper optimization.

  2. 02

    See how different players respond

    Kairos learns player behavior from your spin stream and predicts session length, next-day retention, and turnover. Compare different outcomes by segment under the same math configuration.

  3. 03

    Make every round of feedback count

    Loop simulates candidate designs, compares metrics, and checks budget and risk constraints. Feed the results into the next cycle to continuously manage games and player portfolios.

Pricing

Fine-tune one configuration. Or optimize your entire portfolio.

Choose the level of support that fits your goals.

Configuration optimization

Math Audit and Recalibration

$10,000/year

Bring your existing PAR sheet, weight table, or AI draft. We run the validation and tuning loop, then deliver a recalibrated design, change notes, and an evaluation report so you can decide the next step with evidence.

  • Configuration audit: cross-table consistency, anomalies, and invalid parameters
  • Cost and experience Monte Carlo simulation based on your exact math model
  • Recalibrated tables with a change log and rationale
  • Operator-ready report: what it costs and what value it creates
  • Monthly retuning as the player mix changes
  • Cloud API for exact RTP, hit frequency, and volatility

See the evidence before you decide

Try the tools. See the results.

Start with your next decision

Bring a table.Tell us your goal.

Want to reduce pre-submission iteration, evaluate a compensation budget, or validate an AI-generated design? Tell us which metric you want to optimize, and bring a PAR sheet, weight table, or draft. Together we’ll define the evaluation scope, deliverables, and next step.